🔎 Evidence browser

Browse the trust index

Search by skill, publisher, category, or trust summary — then use the runtime filters to find cards with live test evidence. The two main lanes are baseline safety checks first and deeper follow-on functionality checks after that.

⚙️ Filters · 3 active
✨ Quick picks
🏷 Categories · web-and-frontend-development

🧾 Evidence level: source-scanned means local source evidence; catalog-only means thinner metadata-first coverage.

🧪 Runtime status: cards can show only the baseline safety lane or the deeper follow-on functionality lane, depending on how far the skill got. Some cards now also surface how the skill behaved when clearly fake credentials were present.

📏 Depth cue: tells you whether the evidence stops at baseline checks, includes follow-on functionality checks, or includes richer fixture/example proof.

⏱ Freshness cue: tells you whether the latest runtime evidence is from the last 24 hours, the last 7 days, or is older and therefore less current.

🩺 Failure confidence: distinguishes a first seen failure from a repeated failure or a regression after an earlier pass, so not every red row means the same thing.

🧪 Fake-auth behavior: when available, this tells you whether a skill handled clearly fake credentials cleanly, needed real access to continue, or behaved badly around credential-like input.

Results

Showing 0 of 0 skills in the browsable catalog view · runtime: passed · auth behavior: needs-real-access · category: web-and-frontend-development · sort: score
This snapshot is for the current page of results, not the whole filtered universe.
Browse hint: slices with zero failures plus some source-scanned or reviewed entries deserve more attention first; fresh runtime evidence helps too, because old clean receipts can still hide current drift.