publisher profilecommunity

sohamganatra

sohamganatra publishes 8 tracked skills in DriftBot.

Catalog decision: Mixed but usable publisher: there is meaningful evidence here, but reputation still needs to be earned skill by skill.
8
indexed skills
49
average score
0
manual reviews
0
high-risk labels
catalog evidence snapshotbaseline-v3 coverage 1/8functionality-v2 coverage 1no manual reviews yetno high-risk labels
Read this row as a catalog snapshot: runtime coverage, deeper follow-on coverage, human review presence, and high-risk concentration before you compare individual skills.

πŸ“Š Runtime quality summary

Runtime read: stronger publisher evidence means more than broad coverage β€” look for low current failure pressure, some functionality depth, and stale-runtime counts that stay under control.
eligible runtime skills: 8latest touch: 54m agono current regressions
Baseline coverage
113% of eligible skills have baseline-v3 receipts
Baseline pass rate
100%1 passed Β· 0 currently failing
Functionality coverage
1100% of baseline-cleared skills have functionality-v2
Fixture-backed rate
0%0 functionality-v2 rows have richer fixture/example proof
Stale baseline rows
0baseline receipts older than 7 days
Functionality failures
0current failed functionality-v2 rows in the latest publisher state

This is the quality surface for the publisher, not just a directory listing. It shows how much of the catalog has real receipts, how often those receipts are passing, whether richer fixture-backed proof exists, and whether the publisher currently carries regressions, reproduced failures, or stale runtime evidence.

Latest runtime touch: 2026-03-16 00:45 UTC. Publisher-level summaries do not replace skill-level review, but they do make reputation more earned: a publisher with broader coverage, stronger pass rates, and fixture-backed proof looks different from one living on thin smoke tests.

If you want the system-wide view, open the runtime dashboard. If you want the scoring logic, read the methodology.

Skills from this publisher

Showing 8 of 8 skills

Label mix on this page

Trusted: 0Use Caution: 2Insufficient Evidence: 6High Risk: 0

This distribution is a quick provenance cue, not a verdict. A publisher can have a mix of safer and riskier skills, so the useful move is to compare patterns here and then open the individual scorecards.

Publisher profiles are best for spotting catalog patterns: repeated shell access, common external services, whether manual review exists, and whether higher-risk labels are isolated or widespread.

On this page: 8 source-scanned, 0 catalog-only, and 0 manually reviewed entries in the current slice.

If you want the scoring logic, read the methodology. If you want the broader landscape, go back to the full index.

connect-apps

sohamganatra Β· vsource-scanned
54
overall

Connect Claude to external apps like Gmail, Slack, GitHub. Use this skill when the user wants to send emails, create issues, post messages, or take actions in external services.

Use Cautionconfidence: source evidencesource-scanned
+ 1 more
privileged capability
Take: Source-aware scan found higher-privilege capability areas (oauth, telegram, gmail, email), but that alone is not evidence of malicious behavior.
Decision cue: Decent evidence base β€” source-level signals are available, so inspect the receipts.

airtable-automation

sohamganatra Β· vsource-scanned
53
overall

Automate Airtable tasks via Rube MCP (Composio): records, bases, tables, fields, views. Always search tools first for current schemas.

Insufficient Evidenceconfidence: source evidencesource-scanned
+ 1 more
privileged capability
Take: Source-aware scan found normal operational surface via environment, network, or shell-related references.
Decision cue: Decent evidence base β€” source-level signals are available, so inspect the receipts.

bamboohr-automation

sohamganatra Β· vsource-scanned
52
overall

Automate BambooHR tasks via Rube MCP (Composio): employees, time-off, benefits, dependents, employee updates. Always search tools first for current schemas.

Insufficient Evidenceconfidence: source evidencesource-scanned
+ 1 more
privileged capability
Take: Source-aware scan found higher-privilege capability areas (email), but that alone is not evidence of malicious behavior.
Decision cue: Decent evidence base β€” source-level signals are available, so inspect the receipts.

cal-com-automation

sohamganatra Β· vsource-scanned
51
overall

Automate Cal.com tasks via Rube MCP (Composio): manage bookings, check availability, configure webhooks, and handle teams. Always search tools first for current schemas.

Insufficient Evidenceconfidence: source evidencesource-scanned
+ 1 more
privileged capability
Take: Source-aware scan found higher-privilege capability areas (email), but that alone is not evidence of malicious behavior.
Decision cue: Decent evidence base β€” source-level signals are available, so inspect the receipts.

amplitude-automation

sohamganatra Β· vsource-scanned
50
overall

Automate Amplitude tasks via Rube MCP (Composio): events, user activity, cohorts, user identification. Always search tools first for current schemas.

Insufficient Evidenceconfidence: source evidencesource-scanned
+ 1 more
privileged capability
Take: Source-aware scan found higher-privilege capability areas (email), but that alone is not evidence of malicious behavior.
Decision cue: Decent evidence base β€” source-level signals are available, so inspect the receipts.

bitbucket-automation

sohamganatra Β· vsource-scanned
50
overall

Automate Bitbucket repositories, pull requests, branches, issues, and workspace management via Rube MCP (Composio). Always search tools first for current schemas.

Insufficient Evidenceconfidence: source evidencesource-scanned
+ 1 more
privileged capability
Take: Source-aware scan found higher-privilege capability areas (oauth), but that alone is not evidence of malicious behavior.
Decision cue: Decent evidence base β€” source-level signals are available, so inspect the receipts.

basecamp-automation

sohamganatra Β· vsource-scanned
48
overall

Automate Basecamp project management, to-dos, messages, people, and to-do list organization via Rube MCP (Composio). Always search tools first for current schemas.

Insufficient Evidenceconfidence: source evidencesource-scanned
+ 1 more
privileged capability
Take: Source-aware scan found higher-privilege capability areas (oauth, email), but that alone is not evidence of malicious behavior.
Decision cue: Decent evidence base β€” source-level signals are available, so inspect the receipts.

box-automation

sohamganatra Β· vsource-scanned
35
overall

Automate Box cloud storage operations including file upload/download, search, folder management, sharing, collaborations, and metadata queries via Rube MCP (Composio). Always search tools first for current schemas.

Use Cautionfollow-on functionality checks passed Β· 5/5confidence: source evidence
+ 2 more
source-scannedsuspicious
Runtime receipts + what passed2026-03-16 00:45 UTC
functionality-v2evidence depth: follow-on functionality checkstested recently: within 24 hourspassedoutput 80 Bartifacts 0worker oc-sandboxsource stage: cache hitsuite 1649 msbaseline-v3 8/8
RatioDaemon on this skillBox Automation looks aimed at box automation. Baseline-v3 currently passes, the trust label is High Risk, and setup looks advanced.
Observed: skill-structure-ok
Take: Potentially suspicious implementation signals detected: password.
Decision cue: Proceed carefully β€” suspicious signals matter more than capability surface alone.
Page 1 / 1

Trust reading guide

Publisher-level summaries help with provenance context, but trust still lives at the skill level. Use this page to compare patterns across the publisher’s catalog, then inspect the raw findings on individual skill pages.

Back to the full index