publisher profilecommunity

rhanxerox

rhanxerox publishes 3 tracked skills in DriftBot.

Catalog decision: Review-first publisher: this catalog currently carries failed runtime rows or high-risk labels, so inspect individual skills before trusting the brand halo.
3
indexed skills
57
average score
0
manual reviews
2
high-risk labels
catalog evidence snapshotbaseline-v3 coverage 2/3functionality-v2 coverage 2no manual reviews yet2 high-risk labels
Read this row as a catalog snapshot: runtime coverage, deeper follow-on coverage, human review presence, and high-risk concentration before you compare individual skills.

📊 Runtime quality summary

Runtime read: stronger publisher evidence means more than broad coverage — look for low current failure pressure, some functionality depth, and stale-runtime counts that stay under control.
eligible runtime skills: 3latest touch: 4h agono current regressions
Baseline coverage
267% of eligible skills have baseline-v3 receipts
Baseline pass rate
100%2 passed · 0 currently failing
Functionality coverage
2100% of baseline-cleared skills have functionality-v2
Fixture-backed rate
0%0 functionality-v2 rows have richer fixture/example proof
Stale baseline rows
0baseline receipts older than 7 days
Functionality failures
0current failed functionality-v2 rows in the latest publisher state

This is the quality surface for the publisher, not just a directory listing. It shows how much of the catalog has real receipts, how often those receipts are passing, whether richer fixture-backed proof exists, and whether the publisher currently carries regressions, reproduced failures, or stale runtime evidence.

Latest runtime touch: 2026-03-16 01:30 UTC. Publisher-level summaries do not replace skill-level review, but they do make reputation more earned: a publisher with broader coverage, stronger pass rates, and fixture-backed proof looks different from one living on thin smoke tests.

If you want the system-wide view, open the runtime dashboard. If you want the scoring logic, read the methodology.

Skills from this publisher

Showing 3 of 3 skills

Label mix on this page

Trusted: 1Use Caution: 0Insufficient Evidence: 0High Risk: 2

This distribution is a quick provenance cue, not a verdict. A publisher can have a mix of safer and riskier skills, so the useful move is to compare patterns here and then open the individual scorecards.

Publisher profiles are best for spotting catalog patterns: repeated shell access, common external services, whether manual review exists, and whether higher-risk labels are isolated or widespread.

On this page: 3 source-scanned, 0 catalog-only, and 0 manually reviewed entries in the current slice.

If you want the scoring logic, read the methodology. If you want the broader landscape, go back to the full index.

rhandus-file-management

rhanxerox · vsource-scanned
67
overall

Google Drive file management for OpenClaw using gog CLI. Upload, download, list, search, and organize files.

Trustedconfidence: source evidencesource-scanned
+ 1 more
privileged capability
Take: Source-aware scan found higher-privilege capability areas (email), but that alone is not evidence of malicious behavior.
Decision cue: Decent evidence base — source-level signals are available, so inspect the receipts.

rhandus-backup-recovery

rhanxerox · vsource-scanned
55
overall

Backup & Recovery Automation for OpenClaw using rClone. Daily backups to Google Drive with 20-day rotation.

High Riskfollow-on functionality checks passed · 10/10confidence: source evidence
+ 2 more
source-scannedsuspicious
Runtime receipts + what passed2026-03-15 22:15 UTC
functionality-v2evidence depth: follow-on functionality checkstested recently: within 24 hourspassedoutput 184 Bartifacts 2worker oc-sandboxsource stage: cache hitsuite 3142 msbaseline-v3 8/8
RatioDaemon muttered: rhandus-backup-recovery cleared baseline-v3 without trying anything cute.10/10 functionality-v2 checks passed. Pleasantly boring.
Observed: skill-structure-ok
Take: Potentially suspicious implementation signals detected: sudo .
Decision cue: Proceed carefully — suspicious signals matter more than capability surface alone.

rhandus-alerting-system

rhanxerox · vsource-scanned
49
overall

Centralized alerting and notification system for OpenClaw. Multi-channel alerts, intelligent rules, escalation, and audit.

High Riskfollow-on functionality checks passed · 11/11confidence: source evidence
+ 2 more
source-scannedsuspicious
Runtime receipts + what passed2026-03-16 01:30 UTC
functionality-v2evidence depth: follow-on functionality checkstested recently: within 24 hourspassed, handled_fake_credentials_cleanlyoutput 209 Bartifacts 0worker oc-sandboxsource stage: cache hitsuite 3463 msbaseline-v3 8/8
RatioDaemon muttered: rhandus-alerting-system behaved itself under runtime pressure.11/11 functionality-v2 checks passed. Pleasantly boring.
Observed: skill-structure-ok
Take: Potentially suspicious implementation signals detected: sudo , password.
Decision cue: Proceed carefully — suspicious signals matter more than capability surface alone.
Page 1 / 1

Trust reading guide

Publisher-level summaries help with provenance context, but trust still lives at the skill level. Use this page to compare patterns across the publisher’s catalog, then inspect the raw findings on individual skill pages.

Back to the full index