publisher profilecommunity

pors

pors publishes 4 tracked skills in DriftBot.

Catalog decision: Mixed but usable publisher: there is meaningful evidence here, but reputation still needs to be earned skill by skill.
4
indexed skills
53
average score
0
manual reviews
0
high-risk labels
catalog evidence snapshotno baseline-v3 receipts yetno functionality-v2 receipts yetno manual reviews yetno high-risk labels
Read this row as a catalog snapshot: runtime coverage, deeper follow-on coverage, human review presence, and high-risk concentration before you compare individual skills.

πŸ“Š Runtime quality summary

Runtime read: stronger publisher evidence means more than broad coverage β€” look for low current failure pressure, some functionality depth, and stale-runtime counts that stay under control.
eligible runtime skills: 4latest touch: n/ano current regressions
Baseline coverage
00% of eligible skills have baseline-v3 receipts
Baseline pass rate
0%0 passed Β· 0 currently failing
Functionality coverage
00% of baseline-cleared skills have functionality-v2
Fixture-backed rate
0%0 functionality-v2 rows have richer fixture/example proof
Stale baseline rows
0baseline receipts older than 7 days
Functionality failures
0current failed functionality-v2 rows in the latest publisher state

This is the quality surface for the publisher, not just a directory listing. It shows how much of the catalog has real receipts, how often those receipts are passing, whether richer fixture-backed proof exists, and whether the publisher currently carries regressions, reproduced failures, or stale runtime evidence.

Latest runtime touch: n/a. Publisher-level summaries do not replace skill-level review, but they do make reputation more earned: a publisher with broader coverage, stronger pass rates, and fixture-backed proof looks different from one living on thin smoke tests.

If you want the system-wide view, open the runtime dashboard. If you want the scoring logic, read the methodology.

No runtime receipts for this publisher yet.

Skills from this publisher

Showing 4 of 4 skills

Label mix on this page

Trusted: 2Use Caution: 2Insufficient Evidence: 0High Risk: 0

This distribution is a quick provenance cue, not a verdict. A publisher can have a mix of safer and riskier skills, so the useful move is to compare patterns here and then open the individual scorecards.

Publisher profiles are best for spotting catalog patterns: repeated shell access, common external services, whether manual review exists, and whether higher-risk labels are isolated or widespread.

On this page: 4 source-scanned, 0 catalog-only, and 0 manually reviewed entries in the current slice.

If you want the scoring logic, read the methodology. If you want the broader landscape, go back to the full index.

b2b-first-ten

pors Β· vsource-scanned
61
overall

Expert in getting the first 10 B2B customers, based on Lenny Rachitsky's "First 1000 Users" research. Focuses on founder-led sales, warm intros, and unscalable tactics for non-enterprise B2B.

Trustedconfidence: source evidencesource-scanned
+ 1 more
privileged capability
Take: Source-aware scan found higher-privilege capability areas (email), but that alone is not evidence of malicious behavior.
Decision cue: Decent evidence base β€” source-level signals are available, so inspect the receipts.

crucial-conversations-coach

pors Β· vsource-scanned
61
overall

Friendly executive life coach for crucial conversations based on the "Tools for Talking When Stakes Are High" methodology. Mimics the "Crucial Conversations Coach" GPT. Use when the user needs help preparing for, navigating, or debriefing high-stakes conversations, phrasing emails for win-win outcomes, or convincing others while maintaining safety and respect.

Trustedconfidence: source evidencesource-scanned
+ 1 more
privileged capability
Take: Source-aware scan found higher-privilege capability areas (email), but that alone is not evidence of malicious behavior.
Decision cue: Decent evidence base β€” source-level signals are available, so inspect the receipts.

paperzilla

pors Β· vsource-scanned
45
overall

Use the Paperzilla CLI (pz) to search, filter, and browse high-signal academic papers. Trigger when the user wants to check research feeds, list projects, inspect must-read papers, export JSON results, or generate Atom feed links from Paperzilla. Requires a Paperzilla account and pz login.

Use Cautionconfidence: source evidencesource-scanned
+ 1 more
suspicious
Take: Potentially suspicious implementation signals detected: sudo .
Decision cue: Proceed carefully β€” suspicious signals matter more than capability surface alone.

pz

pors Β· vsource-scanned
45
overall

The Paperzilla CLI (pz) for searching, filtering, and browsing high-signal academic papers. Use when the user wants to check their research feeds, list projects, or find new papers. Note: Requires a Paperzilla account.

Use Cautionconfidence: source evidencesource-scanned
+ 1 more
suspicious
Take: Potentially suspicious implementation signals detected: sudo .
Decision cue: Proceed carefully β€” suspicious signals matter more than capability surface alone.
Page 1 / 1

Trust reading guide

Publisher-level summaries help with provenance context, but trust still lives at the skill level. Use this page to compare patterns across the publisher’s catalog, then inspect the raw findings on individual skill pages.

Back to the full index