publisher profilecommunity

peti0402

peti0402 publishes 5 tracked skills in DriftBot.

Catalog decision: Mixed but usable publisher: there is meaningful evidence here, but reputation still needs to be earned skill by skill.
5
indexed skills
53
average score
0
manual reviews
0
high-risk labels
catalog evidence snapshotno baseline-v3 receipts yetno functionality-v2 receipts yetno manual reviews yetno high-risk labels
Read this row as a catalog snapshot: runtime coverage, deeper follow-on coverage, human review presence, and high-risk concentration before you compare individual skills.

πŸ“Š Runtime quality summary

Runtime read: stronger publisher evidence means more than broad coverage β€” look for low current failure pressure, some functionality depth, and stale-runtime counts that stay under control.
eligible runtime skills: 5latest touch: n/ano current regressions
Baseline coverage
00% of eligible skills have baseline-v3 receipts
Baseline pass rate
0%0 passed Β· 0 currently failing
Functionality coverage
00% of baseline-cleared skills have functionality-v2
Fixture-backed rate
0%0 functionality-v2 rows have richer fixture/example proof
Stale baseline rows
0baseline receipts older than 7 days
Functionality failures
0current failed functionality-v2 rows in the latest publisher state

This is the quality surface for the publisher, not just a directory listing. It shows how much of the catalog has real receipts, how often those receipts are passing, whether richer fixture-backed proof exists, and whether the publisher currently carries regressions, reproduced failures, or stale runtime evidence.

Latest runtime touch: n/a. Publisher-level summaries do not replace skill-level review, but they do make reputation more earned: a publisher with broader coverage, stronger pass rates, and fixture-backed proof looks different from one living on thin smoke tests.

If you want the system-wide view, open the runtime dashboard. If you want the scoring logic, read the methodology.

No runtime receipts for this publisher yet.

Skills from this publisher

Showing 5 of 5 skills

Label mix on this page

Trusted: 1Use Caution: 1Insufficient Evidence: 3High Risk: 0

This distribution is a quick provenance cue, not a verdict. A publisher can have a mix of safer and riskier skills, so the useful move is to compare patterns here and then open the individual scorecards.

Publisher profiles are best for spotting catalog patterns: repeated shell access, common external services, whether manual review exists, and whether higher-risk labels are isolated or widespread.

On this page: 5 source-scanned, 0 catalog-only, and 0 manually reviewed entries in the current slice.

If you want the scoring logic, read the methodology. If you want the broader landscape, go back to the full index.

anti-amnesia

peti0402 Β· vsource-scanned
59
overall

Complete anti-amnesia system for OpenClaw agents. Prevents context loss across sessions with structured state files, automatic session saving, health monitoring, and decision tracking. Your agent wakes up knowing everything β€” every time.

Trustedconfidence: source evidencesource-scanned
+ 1 more
privileged capability
Take: Source-aware scan found higher-privilege capability areas (trading), but that alone is not evidence of malicious behavior.
Decision cue: Decent evidence base β€” source-level signals are available, so inspect the receipts.

auto-watchdog

peti0402 Β· vsource-scanned
56
overall

Automatic health monitoring and self-healing for OpenClaw agents. Monitors cron jobs, processes, disk usage, and API health. Auto-restarts crashed services and alerts on issues. Set it and forget it.

Insufficient Evidenceconfidence: source evidencesource-scanned
+ 1 more
privileged capability
Take: Source-aware scan found higher-privilege capability areas (trading), but that alone is not evidence of malicious behavior.
Decision cue: Decent evidence base β€” source-level signals are available, so inspect the receipts.

trading-tournament

peti0402 Β· vsource-scanned
52
overall

Run autonomous multi-agent trading competitions on OKX. 5 AI agents compete with real-time market data, evolutionary selection replaces losers daily, exchange-level stop-losses protect capital. Battle-tested framework for algorithmic trading research.

Insufficient Evidenceconfidence: source evidencesource-scanned
+ 1 more
privileged capability
Take: Source-aware scan found higher-privilege capability areas (trading, telegram), but that alone is not evidence of malicious behavior.
Decision cue: Decent evidence base β€” source-level signals are available, so inspect the receipts.

hype-scanner

peti0402 Β· vsource-scanned
49
overall

Real-time crypto and stock hype detection using Reddit, CoinGecko, DEXScreener, and StockTwits. AI-powered signal validation with local Ollama model. Only real hype passes β€” zero noise. Use when you want early signals on viral tokens, meme coins, or stocks before they hit mainstream.

Use Cautionconfidence: source evidencesource-scanned
+ 1 more
privileged capability
Take: Source-aware scan found higher-privilege capability areas (trading, token, telegram), but that alone is not evidence of malicious behavior.
Decision cue: Decent evidence base β€” source-level signals are available, so inspect the receipts.

okx-competition

peti0402 Β· vsource-scanned
49
overall

5 AI trading agents compete live on OKX Demo (real prices). Evolutionary tournament β€” losers get replaced daily. Exchange-level stop-losses protect capital. Full autonomous trading system: strategy backtesting, agent evolution, cron automation. Use for: algorithmic trading research, paper trading, building toward live trading. Supports OKX Demo and Live modes.

Insufficient Evidenceconfidence: source evidencesource-scanned
+ 1 more
privileged capability
Take: Source-aware scan found higher-privilege capability areas (trading), but that alone is not evidence of malicious behavior.
Decision cue: Decent evidence base β€” source-level signals are available, so inspect the receipts.
Page 1 / 1

Trust reading guide

Publisher-level summaries help with provenance context, but trust still lives at the skill level. Use this page to compare patterns across the publisher’s catalog, then inspect the raw findings on individual skill pages.

Back to the full index