mikonos
mikonos publishes 2 tracked skills in DriftBot.
π Runtime quality summary
This is the quality surface for the publisher, not just a directory listing. It shows how much of the catalog has real receipts, how often those receipts are passing, whether richer fixture-backed proof exists, and whether the publisher currently carries regressions, reproduced failures, or stale runtime evidence.
Latest runtime touch: n/a. Publisher-level summaries do not replace skill-level review, but they do make reputation more earned: a publisher with broader coverage, stronger pass rates, and fixture-backed proof looks different from one living on thin smoke tests.
If you want the system-wide view, open the runtime dashboard. If you want the scoring logic, read the methodology.
No runtime receipts for this publisher yet.
Skills from this publisher
Label mix on this page
This distribution is a quick provenance cue, not a verdict. A publisher can have a mix of safer and riskier skills, so the useful move is to compare patterns here and then open the individual scorecards.
Publisher profiles are best for spotting catalog patterns: repeated shell access, common external services, whether manual review exists, and whether higher-risk labels are isolated or widespread.
On this page: 2 source-scanned, 0 catalog-only, and 0 manually reviewed entries in the current slice.
If you want the scoring logic, read the methodology. If you want the broader landscape, go back to the full index.
interview-designer
Analyze resumes and design interview strategies using evidence-based methodology. Transforms interview prep from "read resume β ask questions" into "define standard β forensic evidence β future simulation". Combines Geoff Smart's Topgrading, Lou Adler's performance-based hiring, and Daniel Kahneman's bias control. Use when preparing for interviews, creating structured interview guides, or designing questions to validate candidate competencies.
+ 1 more
interview-analysis
Deep interview analysis using dynamic expert routing. Automatically selects top domain thinkers based on role type to distinguish genuine capability from performance, identifying Battle Scars over Methodology Recitation. Applicable to any professional position including product management, engineering, design, operations, sales, and data science.
+ 1 more
Trust reading guide
Publisher-level summaries help with provenance context, but trust still lives at the skill level. Use this page to compare patterns across the publisherβs catalog, then inspect the raw findings on individual skill pages.