publisher profilecommunity

lukeslp

lukeslp publishes 6 tracked skills in DriftBot.

Catalog decision: Mixed but usable publisher: there is meaningful evidence here, but reputation still needs to be earned skill by skill.
6
indexed skills
56
average score
0
manual reviews
0
high-risk labels
catalog evidence snapshotno baseline-v3 receipts yetno functionality-v2 receipts yetno manual reviews yetno high-risk labels
Read this row as a catalog snapshot: runtime coverage, deeper follow-on coverage, human review presence, and high-risk concentration before you compare individual skills.

πŸ“Š Runtime quality summary

Runtime read: stronger publisher evidence means more than broad coverage β€” look for low current failure pressure, some functionality depth, and stale-runtime counts that stay under control.
eligible runtime skills: 6latest touch: n/ano current regressions
Baseline coverage
00% of eligible skills have baseline-v3 receipts
Baseline pass rate
0%0 passed Β· 0 currently failing
Functionality coverage
00% of baseline-cleared skills have functionality-v2
Fixture-backed rate
0%0 functionality-v2 rows have richer fixture/example proof
Stale baseline rows
0baseline receipts older than 7 days
Functionality failures
0current failed functionality-v2 rows in the latest publisher state

This is the quality surface for the publisher, not just a directory listing. It shows how much of the catalog has real receipts, how often those receipts are passing, whether richer fixture-backed proof exists, and whether the publisher currently carries regressions, reproduced failures, or stale runtime evidence.

Latest runtime touch: n/a. Publisher-level summaries do not replace skill-level review, but they do make reputation more earned: a publisher with broader coverage, stronger pass rates, and fixture-backed proof looks different from one living on thin smoke tests.

If you want the system-wide view, open the runtime dashboard. If you want the scoring logic, read the methodology.

No runtime receipts for this publisher yet.

Skills from this publisher

Showing 6 of 6 skills

Label mix on this page

Trusted: 2Use Caution: 0Insufficient Evidence: 4High Risk: 0

This distribution is a quick provenance cue, not a verdict. A publisher can have a mix of safer and riskier skills, so the useful move is to compare patterns here and then open the individual scorecards.

Publisher profiles are best for spotting catalog patterns: repeated shell access, common external services, whether manual review exists, and whether higher-risk labels are isolated or widespread.

On this page: 6 source-scanned, 0 catalog-only, and 0 manually reviewed entries in the current slice.

If you want the scoring logic, read the methodology. If you want the broader landscape, go back to the full index.

geepers-etymology

lukeslp Β· vsource-scanned
59
overall

Look up word etymology, historical sound changes, language family trees, and word evolution through the dr.eamer.dev etymology and diachronic linguistics API. Use for language history research, writing, or exploring how words have changed over time.

Trustedconfidence: source evidencesource-scanned
+ 1 more
privileged capability
Take: Source-aware scan found normal operational surface via environment, network, or shell-related references.
Decision cue: Decent evidence base β€” source-level signals are available, so inspect the receipts.

geepers-orchestrate

lukeslp Β· vsource-scanned
59
overall

Run multi-agent Dream Cascade (hierarchical 3-tier synthesis) or Dream Swarm (parallel multi-domain search) workflows via the dr.eamer.dev orchestration API. Use when a task benefits from multiple specialized agents working in parallel or hierarchically.

Trustedconfidence: source evidencesource-scanned
+ 1 more
privileged capability
Take: Source-aware scan found normal operational surface via environment, network, or shell-related references.
Decision cue: Decent evidence base β€” source-level signals are available, so inspect the receipts.

geepers-corpus

lukeslp Β· vsource-scanned
56
overall

Query the COCA (Corpus of Contemporary American English) linguistics API for word frequency, collocations, concordances, and historical usage trends. Use for linguistic research, writing assistance, or understanding how words are actually used in American English.

Insufficient Evidenceconfidence: source evidencesource-scanned
+ 1 more
privileged capability
Take: Source-aware scan found normal operational surface via environment, network, or shell-related references.
Decision cue: Decent evidence base β€” source-level signals are available, so inspect the receipts.

geepers-data

lukeslp Β· vsource-scanned
56
overall

Fetch structured data from 17 authoritative APIs β€” arXiv, Census Bureau, GitHub, NASA, Wikipedia, PubMed, news, weather, finance, FEC, and more β€” through a single endpoint. Use when you need real data from authoritative sources for research, visualizations, or analysis.

Insufficient Evidenceconfidence: source evidencesource-scanned
+ 1 more
privileged capability
Take: Source-aware scan found normal operational surface via environment, network, or shell-related references.
Decision cue: Decent evidence base β€” source-level signals are available, so inspect the receipts.

dreamer-llm

lukeslp Β· vsource-scanned
53
overall

Send requests to the dr.eamer.dev LLM API for chat completions, vision analysis, image generation, text-to-speech, and video generation across 12 model providers. Use when you need to call an external LLM endpoint or want to compare responses across providers.

Insufficient Evidenceconfidence: source evidencesource-scanned
+ 1 more
privileged capability
Take: Source-aware scan found higher-privilege capability areas (email), but that alone is not evidence of malicious behavior.
Decision cue: Decent evidence base β€” source-level signals are available, so inspect the receipts.

geepers-llm

lukeslp Β· vsource-scanned
53
overall

Send requests to the dr.eamer.dev LLM API for chat completions, vision analysis, image generation, text-to-speech, and video generation across 12 model providers. Use when you need to call an external LLM endpoint or want to compare responses across providers.

Insufficient Evidenceconfidence: source evidencesource-scanned
+ 1 more
privileged capability
Take: Source-aware scan found higher-privilege capability areas (email), but that alone is not evidence of malicious behavior.
Decision cue: Decent evidence base β€” source-level signals are available, so inspect the receipts.
Page 1 / 1

Trust reading guide

Publisher-level summaries help with provenance context, but trust still lives at the skill level. Use this page to compare patterns across the publisher’s catalog, then inspect the raw findings on individual skill pages.

Back to the full index