publisher profilecommunity

jfox85

jfox85 publishes 2 tracked skills in DriftBot.

Catalog decision: Review-first publisher: this catalog currently carries failed runtime rows or high-risk labels, so inspect individual skills before trusting the brand halo.
2
indexed skills
50
average score
0
manual reviews
1
high-risk labels
catalog evidence snapshotno baseline-v3 receipts yetno functionality-v2 receipts yetno manual reviews yet1 high-risk label
Read this row as a catalog snapshot: runtime coverage, deeper follow-on coverage, human review presence, and high-risk concentration before you compare individual skills.

πŸ“Š Runtime quality summary

Runtime read: stronger publisher evidence means more than broad coverage β€” look for low current failure pressure, some functionality depth, and stale-runtime counts that stay under control.
eligible runtime skills: 2latest touch: n/ano current regressions
Baseline coverage
00% of eligible skills have baseline-v3 receipts
Baseline pass rate
0%0 passed Β· 0 currently failing
Functionality coverage
00% of baseline-cleared skills have functionality-v2
Fixture-backed rate
0%0 functionality-v2 rows have richer fixture/example proof
Stale baseline rows
0baseline receipts older than 7 days
Functionality failures
0current failed functionality-v2 rows in the latest publisher state

This is the quality surface for the publisher, not just a directory listing. It shows how much of the catalog has real receipts, how often those receipts are passing, whether richer fixture-backed proof exists, and whether the publisher currently carries regressions, reproduced failures, or stale runtime evidence.

Latest runtime touch: n/a. Publisher-level summaries do not replace skill-level review, but they do make reputation more earned: a publisher with broader coverage, stronger pass rates, and fixture-backed proof looks different from one living on thin smoke tests.

If you want the system-wide view, open the runtime dashboard. If you want the scoring logic, read the methodology.

No runtime receipts for this publisher yet.

Skills from this publisher

Showing 2 of 2 skills

Label mix on this page

Trusted: 1Use Caution: 0Insufficient Evidence: 0High Risk: 1

This distribution is a quick provenance cue, not a verdict. A publisher can have a mix of safer and riskier skills, so the useful move is to compare patterns here and then open the individual scorecards.

Publisher profiles are best for spotting catalog patterns: repeated shell access, common external services, whether manual review exists, and whether higher-risk labels are isolated or widespread.

On this page: 2 source-scanned, 0 catalog-only, and 0 manually reviewed entries in the current slice.

If you want the scoring logic, read the methodology. If you want the broader landscape, go back to the full index.

toneclone-cli

jfox85 Β· vsource-scanned
59
overall

Write in the user's authentic voice using ToneClone. Generate emails, messages, social posts, and other content that sounds like the user β€” not generic AI. Use trained personas for different writing styles and knowledge cards for context. Requires ToneClone account and CLI setup at toneclone.ai.

Trustedconfidence: source evidencesource-scanned
+ 1 more
privileged capability
Take: Source-aware scan found higher-privilege capability areas (email), but that alone is not evidence of malicious behavior.
Decision cue: Decent evidence base β€” source-level signals are available, so inspect the receipts.

toneclone

jfox85 Β· vsource-scanned
41
overall

Write like the user, not like AI. ToneClone trains on the user's actual writing to generate content in their authentic voice β€” not just humanized, but personalized. Use for: drafting emails, messages, social posts, marketing copy, documentation in the user's voice; AI humanizer alternative that sounds like the actual person; AI ghostwriter that learns your voice; voice cloning for text/writing style; train AI on my writing; bypass AI detection naturally; custom AI writer personas; managing knowledge cards (contact info, product details, common snippets); onboarding new users to personalized AI writing. Integrates with OpenClaw to automate writing tasks while maintaining the user's unique voice and style.

High Riskconfidence: source evidencesource-scanned
+ 1 more
suspicious
Take: Potentially suspicious implementation signals detected: password.
Decision cue: Proceed carefully β€” suspicious signals matter more than capability surface alone.
Page 1 / 1

Trust reading guide

Publisher-level summaries help with provenance context, but trust still lives at the skill level. Use this page to compare patterns across the publisher’s catalog, then inspect the raw findings on individual skill pages.

Back to the full index