publisher profilecommunity

benlee2144

benlee2144 publishes 3 tracked skills in DriftBot.

Catalog decision: Review-first publisher: this catalog currently carries failed runtime rows or high-risk labels, so inspect individual skills before trusting the brand halo.
3
indexed skills
56
average score
0
manual reviews
1
high-risk labels
catalog evidence snapshotbaseline-v3 coverage 1/1functionality-v2 coverage 1no manual reviews yet1 high-risk label
Read this row as a catalog snapshot: runtime coverage, deeper follow-on coverage, human review presence, and high-risk concentration before you compare individual skills.

πŸ“Š Runtime quality summary

Runtime read: stronger publisher evidence means more than broad coverage β€” look for low current failure pressure, some functionality depth, and stale-runtime counts that stay under control.
eligible runtime skills: 1latest touch: 10h agono current regressions
Baseline coverage
1100% of eligible skills have baseline-v3 receipts
Baseline pass rate
100%1 passed Β· 0 currently failing
Functionality coverage
1100% of baseline-cleared skills have functionality-v2
Fixture-backed rate
0%0 functionality-v2 rows have richer fixture/example proof
Stale baseline rows
0baseline receipts older than 7 days
Functionality failures
1current failed functionality-v2 rows in the latest publisher state

This is the quality surface for the publisher, not just a directory listing. It shows how much of the catalog has real receipts, how often those receipts are passing, whether richer fixture-backed proof exists, and whether the publisher currently carries regressions, reproduced failures, or stale runtime evidence.

Latest runtime touch: 2026-03-15 20:30 UTC. Publisher-level summaries do not replace skill-level review, but they do make reputation more earned: a publisher with broader coverage, stronger pass rates, and fixture-backed proof looks different from one living on thin smoke tests.

If you want the system-wide view, open the runtime dashboard. If you want the scoring logic, read the methodology.

Skills from this publisher

Showing 3 of 3 skills

Label mix on this page

Trusted: 0Use Caution: 0Insufficient Evidence: 2High Risk: 1

This distribution is a quick provenance cue, not a verdict. A publisher can have a mix of safer and riskier skills, so the useful move is to compare patterns here and then open the individual scorecards.

Publisher profiles are best for spotting catalog patterns: repeated shell access, common external services, whether manual review exists, and whether higher-risk labels are isolated or widespread.

On this page: 1 source-scanned, 2 catalog-only, and 0 manually reviewed entries in the current slice.

If you want the scoring logic, read the methodology. If you want the broader landscape, go back to the full index.

benlee-skillguard

benlee2144 Β· vsource-scanned
57
overall

Security scanner that audits OpenClaw skills for malicious code, prompt injection, supply chain attacks, data exfiltration, and more

High Riskfollow-on functionality checks failed Β· 6/7confidence: source evidence
+ 2 more
source-scannedsuspicious
Runtime receipts + what failed2026-03-15 20:30 UTC
functionality-v2evidence depth: follow-on functionality checkstested recently: within 24 hoursfirst failed run seen for this lanepassed, expectation_failedoutput 99 Bartifacts 0worker oc-sandboxsource stage: cache hitsuite 2450 msbaseline-v3 8/8
πŸ•΅οΈ expected proof signal was missing
RatioDaemon muttered: benlee-skillguard talked a big game, then missed its own proof signal.6/7 functionality-v2 checks passed before the stumble. The requirements txt shape is the part that made this interesting.
Observed: skill-structure-ok
Take: Potentially suspicious implementation signals detected: eval(, password.
Decision cue: Review first β€” functionality-v2 already found trouble.

skillshield

benlee2144 Β· vcatalog
57
overall

SkillShield v4 β€” Ultimate security scanner for OpenClaw skills. 65 security checks, SARIF v2.1.0 output, CI/CD.

Insufficient Evidenceconfidence: limited evidencecatalog-only
+ 1 more
privileged capability
Take: Indexed from the community catalog. Source-aware static analysis and manual review are still pending.
Decision cue: Thin evidence slice β€” do not treat this card like a verified green light.

skill-threat-scanner

benlee2144 Β· vcatalog
55
overall

Scan OpenClaw skills for malware, prompt injection, reverse shells, wallet theft, supply chain attacks, and data.

Insufficient Evidenceconfidence: limited evidencecatalog-only
+ 1 more
privileged capability
Take: Indexed from the community catalog. Source-aware static analysis and manual review are still pending.
Decision cue: Thin evidence slice β€” do not treat this card like a verified green light.
Page 1 / 1

Trust reading guide

Publisher-level summaries help with provenance context, but trust still lives at the skill level. Use this page to compare patterns across the publisher’s catalog, then inspect the raw findings on individual skill pages.

Back to the full index