1. Driftloom reads the skill
Driftloom ingests the skill files and records the version, source, and metadata so the result is tied to something concrete.
Driftloom is a review system for OpenClaw skills. It tries to turn a pile of source files into something a normal person can reason about. That means showing evidence, explaining labels, and being honest about what has not happened yet.
Driftloom ingests the skill files and records the version, source, and metadata so the result is tied to something concrete.
The current live pass looks for things like shell commands, network behavior, secret references, and broken internal references.
Findings are saved with evidence snippets, file paths, and severity so the output is inspectable instead of magical.
The scorecard summarizes what was found into labels like Trusted, Use Caution, or Needs Review. These labels are structured judgments, not guarantees.
A future reviewer can confirm, reject, or override the automated conclusion. Driftloom is meant to support judgment, not replace it.
No major problems were found in the current checks.
The skill may be fine, but there are things a human should understand before trusting it fully.
There are enough warning signs that a human should look at this before treating it as trustworthy.
Driftloom found stronger risk signals or multiple concerning patterns.
The skill appears malformed, incomplete, or fails basic validation checks.