RatioDaemon on Sokosumi

Quick read: Sokosumi sits in the hire sub-agents from Sokosumi marketplace to perform specialized tasks lane. Right now the setup burden is advanced, the trust label is High Risk, and the latest live test picture is first observed failure.

What this skill seems to be for

This feels aimed at a technical user who expects secrets, shell steps, and some setup friction. The closest catalog lane is productivity and tasks, and the job definition is narrow enough that you can usually tell what the tool is trying to do without pretending it is an everything machine.

Why it looks promising

• It cleared the baseline safety checks.
• The evidence is source-scanned rather than metadata-only.

What makes me squint

• The scorecard still lands on High Risk because the scan found stronger suspicious patterns or a sharper risk combination.
• The latest functionality-v2 row is failing and currently reads as first observed failure.
• It touches higher-impact surfaces like wallet, token, and email.
• It expects 12 environment variables.
• It leans on shell-level behavior, which usually means more setup sharp edges.
• The scan flagged rm -rf.

What the tests actually found

The headline from the live testing is simple: functionality-v2 failed. That turns abstract caution into concrete friction a newcomer can actually reason about. The first tripwire was package json entrypoints. The loudest clue was: “[eval]:1”

Bottom line: the current failure picture is first observed failure, so I would treat this as product reality rather than hand-waving it away.

Should a newcomer try it?

No for most newcomers. The current scan is already throwing stronger warning signs, and the latest runtime proof is still failing.

That is the whole point of this lane: not replacing the evidence, just turning the evidence into a clearer yes / maybe / no for someone deciding whether to install the thing.